When I was a sophomore in high school in California, I had a truly excellent biology teacher. The assignments were creative and varied, and the lessons I learned stuck with me long after the class ended. One of the major units we covered in that class was about the insect world. We learned about all of the orders of insects. A major assignment was to collect, identify and classify insects from as many of the orders as we could. For some orders, it was ridiculously easy to find specimens. Hymenoptera (which includes ants, bees & wasps), diptera (including mosquitos and houseflies), coleoptera (beetles), lepidoptera (moths & butterflies) were a dime a dozen, with multiple species of each of those orders crossing our paths regularly. Others required a bit more persistence, hunting through the grass and under rocks, or stalking the porch light at night.
My best friend and I participated in the project with the same competitive/collaborative spirit that drove our academic success, collecting and comparing our insects with interest and enthusiasm. She, who felt revulsion for earwigs, collected her dermaptera specimen with triumph. I, with my aversion to moths, likewise felt satisfaction in including a feathery-antennaed hymenoptera specimen in my own collection. I don’t remember how many orders we each managed to represent in total, but I want to say that it was somewhere around 17 or 18. (I seem to recall that my friend managed to find one that I hadn’t, a fact which she playfully lorded over me.)
That project forever changed how I look at insects.
Living in the woods in rural Massachusetts, we sometimes get wildlife in our yard and around our house. Sometimes, the wildlife makes its way into the house. Once such bit of wildlife was this character, which turned up in our kitchen one June evening in 2010. It had a long segmented body, perhaps 2 and half inches long, and large lacy wings. I was, naturally, fascinated.
Hi.
John and I captured it in a plastic tub with the aim of releasing it. I took a few pictures of it, but sadly, they are blurry in the poor lighting conditions. Also contributing to the blur was the fact that the insect was moving constantly, and I found it hard to get my eyes to focus on it, let alone my camera. The long body and the dramatic wings had an ethereal look to them, and I wondered if sighting of such creatures in the wild, fluttering about in people’s peripheral vision, may have contributed to belief in fairies. (Compare this little guy to the mummified fairy remains highlighted on Raincoaster. If you want to study interesting specimens of humanity, some of whom claim belief in fairies, you might have a look at the comments of that post. 2220 comments to date, many of them very entertaining.)
I’m bigger than your little finger.
Having ruled out that we had captured a fairy, I did wonder what exactly we had caught.
I wondered if it might be a large mayfly, (order ephemeroptera, among the more poetically named orders, reflecting the ephemeral nature of their adults’ lives). However, I think it is too large to be one. Additionally, it is missing the long cerci that mayflies have.
Most likely, it is a kind of fishfly, of the order megaloptera. (Apparently the designation of megaloptera as a separate order from neuroptera is relatively recent–I don’t know when this separation happened, though. It may not have been among the orders I learned about in high school.) Megaloptera, as you might guess from the mega prefix, are known to be large. (They are named for their large wings.)
Can I go now, please?
This week’s friday foto finder challenge was to find photos of insect(s). Unlike urban-dwelling az, who resorted to posting other invertebrates, I have quite a few photos of insects in my archives. (Ah, the perks of rural life.) I even have several posts on different insects. I have two ThThTh lists of moth things and butterfly things (order lepidoptera), plus some posts of my own photos of butterflies (again, lepidoptera) and fireflies (order coleoptera). I’m particularly fond of this one, eat or be eaten, which documents the unlucky encounter of a spider (an arachnid, and not an insect) with a damselfly (order odonata).
To see what other specimens have been caught for this week’s assignment, buzz, flit or crawl over to the friday foto finder blog.
collecting tokens 
Wow. He’s a handsome guy.
Yes, “handsome” is one way to describe him…
The body is darker than the ‘fishflies’ we used to see on Lake Erie when I was a kid, but otherwise the shape, size and wingspan look right. They used to land on us and sort of writhe around, causing us children to shriek.
If you want a few blackflies, I have some I can send you.
Ooh, someone with firsthand experience with fishflies. (Eek!) It sounds like I might be on the right track for identification!
(And thanks for the offer of blackflies, Mary, but I think we have a few here, too.)
What an unusual insect. The flying ones are so hard to capture in focus. btw, there are around a dozen (or more) comments from me on raincoaster’s fairy post :)
Yeah, I have more photos of insects that are more willing to sit on a flower and pose. But this guy kept intriguing me, especially since he’s the only one such critter I’ve met. (Glad not to have had one writing on me as a child as Mary did. My own moth phobia is due to excessive moth contact as a child.)
As for raincoaster’s fairy post, there are some comments there from me as well! Probably not as many as a dozen, but I think a good 5 or 6. And now one pingback!
I have a deep phobia of all things many-legged (including not only every order of insect, but in fact, the entire phylum of arthropods), so I could barely look at this! I am deeply impressed that you managed to include a moth in your collection despite your phobia.
Sorry about that, Sally. I remebered you mentioning your fear of arthropods, and I thought about putting a trigger warning for you. Thank you for braving it out enough to even look at the text!
what is this? https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=271390056319440&set=pcb.271390112986101&type=1&theater